How can you meet this standard, and what types of evidence do you need? It might be difficult to tell without legal knowledge and a thorough understanding of Georgia’s personal injury laws. That’s why getting help from an experienced personal injury attorney who can represent you and ensure your case meets the required evidentiary standard is important.
Our personal injury attorneys at The Dressie Law Firm, LLC understand the intricacies of meeting the standard of proof in personal injury cases and are well-equipped to guide you toward success. Read on as we explore the basics of the preponderance of evidence, highlighting some of the details you might need to succeed with your case.
The Preponderance of Evidence Distinguished From Other Standards of Proof
Different standards of proof are used across courts in the U.S. legal system. For clarity, it is important to distinguish the preponderance of evidence from others.
Thanks to the media, many people are aware of the standard of proof, known as proof beyond reasonable doubt. This standard of proof is used in criminal cases. It is the highest standard of proof and requires the prosecution (the equivalent of the plaintiff)in a criminal case to prove their case so that there’s no reasonable question of the defendant’s guilt in the mind of a reasonable person.
The other standard of proof is known as “clear and convincing evidence.” This standard of proof is next to reasonable doubt in the hierarchy. In cases where this standard of proof is required, the party who filed the claim (plaintiff)must provide evidence to convince the jury that their claim is true to a high degree of probability. Even though there might be room for a little doubt under this standard, the evidence provided by the plaintiff should be enough to convince the judge and jury without hesitation that the plaintiff is in the right in most, if not all, the major aspects of the case.
The preponderance of evidence is the least standard. Generally, this standard of proof is taken to mean that the party seeking to establish a particular claim or fact must show that there is more than a 50% chance that their claim or version of events is true. Essentially, your case might just have to be slightly better than the other party’s to succeed under this standard.
However, even though the preponderance of evidence is widely used to establish liability in civil cases (including personal injury and wrongful death cases), sometimes the law on a subject may specifically demand that a different standard prove a particular aspect of a civil case. For example, OCGA 51-12-5.1 requires personal injury and tort claimants seeking punitive damages (to penalize or deter a defendant) to prove their entitlement to such damages with clear and convincing evidence.
This does not affect their entitlement to general damages or compensation for their losses, which they may have established by proving the other party’s negligence. But if they must get anything extra by way of punitive damages, they would need to go the extra mile to prove that the defendant was guilty of actions like fraud or wilful misconduct with clear and convincing evidence.
The Dressie Law Firm, LLC Can Help You
Contact us today to schedule your free consultation!


